EEOC v. Circuit City ( 2002 )

5(&200(1'(' )25 )8//7(;7 38%/,&$7,21 3XUVXDQW WR 6L[WK &LUFXLW 5XOH  (/(&7521,& &,7$7,21  )(' $SS 3 WK &LU )LOH 1DPH DS 81,7('67$7(6&28572)$33($/6 )257+(6,;7+&,5&8,7 BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB (48$/ (03/2 HV@ QRW LQWHQG WR DVVHUW DQ\ VLJQDWXUHRQWKHDSSOLFDWLRQIRUPERXQGKHUWRVHHNUHOLHIIRU FODLPlmILOHDQ\ODZVXLWlRUmLQWHUYHQHLQWKHODZVXLWZKLFK DQ\DOOHJHGHPSOR\PHQWLQMXU\RQO\LQDQDUELWUDOIRUXP7KH KDV EHHQ ILOHG DJDLQVW &LUFXLW &LW\l  :LWK QHLWKHU D ((2& DQG 6KHOWRQ FRXQWHUHG E\ FRQWHQGLQJ WKDW 6KHOWRQ FRQVWLWXWLRQDOQRUDSUXGHQWLDOEDVLVIRUDVVHUWLQJIHGHUDOFRXUW DORQH ZDV D SDUW\ WR WKH DJUHHPHQW DQG WKDW VKH DJUHHG WR MXULVGLFWLRQRYHU&LUFXLW&LW\jVFRPSODLQWDQGLQYLHZRID IRUHJRMXGLFLDOSURFHHGLQJVRQO\LQVLWXDWLRQVLQZKLFKVKH FRPSODLQWWKDWODFNVDQ\WKHRU\XSRQZKLFKUHFRYHU\FRXOGEH LQLWLDWHGDVXLWRULQZKLFKDQRWLFHRIULJKWWRVXHOHWWHUZDV EDVHGWKHGLVWULFWFRXUWGLGQRWHUULQGHQ\LQJ&LUFXLW&LW\jV LVVXHGE\DJRYHUQPHQWDODJHQF\%HFDXVHWKH((2&DQRQ PRWLRQWRFRPSHODUELWUDWLRQDQGJUDQWLQJ6KHOWRQjVPRWLRQ SDUW\WRWKHDUELWUDWLRQDJUHHPHQWKDGILOHGWKHVXLWDJDLQVW IRUMXGJPHQWRQWKHSOHDGLQJVSXUVXDQWWR)HG5&LY3 &LUFXLW &LW\ WKH &RPPLVVLRQ DQG 6KHOWRQ PDLQWDLQHG WKDW F VXFKDSURFHHGLQJZDVSHUPLVVLEOH7KHGLVWULFWMXGJHUHO\LQJ XSRQFLUFXLWSUHFHGHQWHPERGLHGLQWKHGHFLVLRQVLQ((2&Y )RUWKHUHDVRQVVHWRXWDERYHZH$)),50WKHMXGJPHQWRI )UDQNjV1XUVHU\ &UDIWV,QF)GWK&LU WKHGLVWULFWFRXUW DQG((2&Y1RUWKZHVW$LUOLQHV)GWK&LU DJUHHGZLWKWKH((2&DQG6KHOWRQGLVPLVVHG&LUFXLW &LW\jV DFWLRQ DJDLQVW LWV IRUPHU HPSOR\HH GHQLHG &LUFXLW &LW\jV UHTXHVW IRU D VWD\ LQ WKH ((2&LQLWLDWHG DFWLRQ DQG RUGHUHGWKHFRPSDQ\WRUHVSRQGWRWKDWFRXUWILOLQJ