Princeton University Press v. Michigan Document Services, Inc. , 74 F.3d 1528 ( 1996 )


Menu:
  • 74 F.3d 1528

    PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PRESS, ET AL., Plaintiffs-Appellees,
    v.
    MICHIGAN DOCUMENT SERVICES, INC., ET AL., Defendants-Appellants.

    No. 94-1778.

    United States Court of Appeals,
    Sixth Circuit.

    April 9, 1996.

    BEFORE: MERRITT, Chief Judge; KENNEDY, MARTIN, MILBURN, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS, NORRIS, SUHRHEINRICH, SILER, BATCHELDER, DAUGHTREY, MOORE, and COLE, Circuit Judges.

    ORDER

    1

    A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:

    2

    The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.

    3

    Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

    4

    The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for oral argument as soon as possible.

Document Info

Docket Number: 94-1778

Citation Numbers: 74 F.3d 1528, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 7474, 1996 WL 171606

Judges: Merritt, Kennedy, Martin, Milburn, Nelson, Ryan, Boggs, Norris, Suhrheinrich, Siler, Batchelder, Daughtrey, Moore, Cole

Filed Date: 4/9/1996

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024