Ronnie Anselmo v. U.S. Attorney General , 817 F.2d 756 ( 1987 )

817 F.2d 756

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Ronnie ANSELMO, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 87-1045.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

May 11, 1987.

E.D.Mich.

AFFIRMED.

Before GUY and BOGGS, Circuit Judges, and EDWARDS, Senior Circuit Judge.

ORDER

1

Appellant moves to proceed in forma pauperis and for appointment of counsel on appeal from the district court's order which dismissed appellant's cause.

2

It appears that appellant is serving a sentence imposed after being convicted of violations of 21 U.S.C. Sec.Sec. 841(a)(1) and 846. He filed a document he titles "Petition for Review Pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act" in which he attacks the imposition of his sentence on the basis that the statutes under which he was charged are civil in nature and that the Attorney General has been delegated excessive authority under 21 U.S.C. Sec. 801 et seq.

3

The district court correctly concluded that this document should be construed as a motion to vacate sentence because it attacks the imposition of sentence. See 28 U.S.C. Sec.2255; Wright v. United States Board of Parole, 557 F.2d 74, 77 (6th Cir. 1977). The district court further correctly concluded that the proper court to review a motion to vacate sentence is the court that imposed sentence. United States v. Addonizio, 442 U.S. 178, 185 (1979).

4

For these reasons, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not necessary in this appeal. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a). The motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted, the motion for appointment of counsel is denied and the judgment of the district court is affirmed. Rule 9(b), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.