Myers v. Iron Workers District Counsel of Southern Ohio & Vicinity Pension Trust , 217 F. App'x 526 ( 2007 )


Menu:
  •                 NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION
    File Name: 07a0142n.06
    Filed: February 21, 2007
    No. 05-4632
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
    JOSEPH MYERS,                                              )
    )         ON APPEAL FROM THE
    Plaintiff-Appellant,                                )         UNITED STATES DISTRICT
    )         COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN
    v.                                                         )         DISTRICT OF OHIO
    )
    IRON WORKERS DISTRICT COUNSEL OF                           )                            OPINION
    SOUTHERN OHIO & VICINITY PENSION                           )
    TRUST,                                                     )
    )
    Defendant-Appellee.
    BEFORE:        MARTIN, COLE, and GILMAN, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM. Plaintiff Joseph Myers appeals from a district court order granting
    judgment on the administrative record to Defendant Iron Workers District Council of Southern Ohio
    & Vicinity Pension Trust (the Trust) in an action for payment of disability benefits brought under
    29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1)(B) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. §§
    1001-1461. After a de novo review of the administrative record, the district court concluded that
    Myers’s ailments did not amount to a “total and permanent disability” from ironworking as defined
    by the Trust and, therefore, the Trust did not wrongfully deny Myers a disability pension. Myers
    appeals, claiming that the administrative record supports a finding that he is totally and permanently
    disabled within the Trust’s definition. As a result, says Myers, he is entitled to a disability pension.
    No. 05-4632
    Myers v. Iron Workers Dist
    Having reviewed the district court opinion de novo, Glenn v. MetLife, 
    461 F.3d 660
    , 665 (6th
    Cir. 2006) , and upon careful review of the record and the parties’ submissions, we conclude that the
    issuance of a more detailed opinion by this Court would be duplicative and serve no useful purpose.
    Accordingly, for substantially the same reasons set forth in the district court’s comprehensive and
    well-reasoned opinion, Myers v. Iron Workers Dist. Council of S. Ohio & Vicinity Pension Trust, No.
    2:04-CV-966, 
    2005 WL 2979472
    (S.D. Ohio Nov. 7, 2005), we AFFIRM the district court order
    granting judgment on the administrative record to the Trust.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 05-4632

Citation Numbers: 217 F. App'x 526

Judges: Martin, Cole, Gilman

Filed Date: 2/21/2007

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024