Acklen v. Illinois Central Railroad , 116 F.2d 934 ( 1940 )

PER CURIAM.

This cause was heard upon the transcript of the record, briefs of counsel and argument by counsel for appellees, and it appearing to .the court that there was no substantial evidence to support a verdict for the appellant, and that there was no abuse of discretion in the denial of .appellant’s motion for a new trial, it is therefore ordered and adjudged that the judgment appealed from, be and is in all things affirmed.