United States v. Jerome A. Susskind (91-1003), James J. Rumler (91-1004), Scott Nickerson (91-1005) , 975 F.2d 1206 ( 1992 )

975 F.2d 1206

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Jerome A. SUSSKIND (91-1003), James J. Rumler (91-1004),
Scott Nickerson (91-1005), Defendants-Appellants.

Nos. 91-1003 to 91-1005.

United States Court of Appeals,
Sixth Circuit.

Sept. 4, 1992.

Before: MERRITT, Chief Judge; KEITH, KENEDY, MARTIN, JONES, MILBURN, GUY, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS, NORRIS, SURHREINRICH, SILER, and BATCHELDER, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of these cases en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:

2

The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket as a pending appeal.

3

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and these cases are restored to the docket as pending appeals.

4

The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule the cases for oral argument as soon as practicable.