United States v. Troy Burton , 327 F. App'x 666 ( 2009 )


Menu:
  •                         NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION
    To be cited only in accordance with
    Fed. R. App. P. 32.1
    United States Court of Appeals
    For the Seventh Circuit
    Chicago, Illinois 60604
    Submitted June 23, 2009*
    Decided June 29, 2009
    Before
    RICHARD D. CUDAHY, Circuit Judge
    RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge
    TERENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judge
    No. 08-3300
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                           Appeal from the United States District
    Plaintiff-Appellee,                            Court for the Eastern District of
    Wisconsin.
    v.
    No. 04-CR-245
    TROY S. BURTON,
    Defendant-Appellant.                           J.P. Stadtmueller,
    Judge.
    ORDER
    Troy Burton was sentenced as an Armed Career Criminal and is serving 180 months
    in prison, the statutory minimum, for possessing a firearm as a felon. See 
    18 U.S.C. §§ 922
    (g)(1), 924(e)(1). Burton moved to have his sentence reduced pursuant to 
    18 U.S.C. § 3582
    (c)(2) because, he says, Amendment 709 to the sentencing guidelines entitles him to a
    *
    After examining the briefs and record, we have concluded that oral argument is
    unnecessary. Thus, the appeal is submitted on the briefs and the record. See FED. R. A PP. P.
    34(a)(2).
    No. 08-3300                                                                             Page 2
    lower sentence. See U.S.S.G. § 4A1.2(a)(2), Supp. to App. C 235 (2008) (Amendment 709).
    The district court denied the motion.
    Amendment 709 was not made retroactive by the Sentencing Commission and is not
    a ground for reduction under § 3582(c)(2). United States v. Alexander, 
    553 F.3d 591
    , 593 (7th
    Cir. 2009). More importantly, Amendment 709, which altered the rules for calculating
    criminal history under the Sentencing Guidelines, has no relevance to the determination
    whether a defendant qualifies as an Armed Career Criminal. See U.S.S.G. § 4B1.4 cmt. no. 1;
    United States v. Hobbs, 
    135 F.3d 384
    , 388 (4th Cir. 1998); United States v. Wright, 
    48 F.3d 254
    ,
    255-56 (7th Cir. 1995). Even if the amendment had been made retroactive, it could not have
    benefitted Burton.
    AFFIRMED.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 08-3300

Citation Numbers: 327 F. App'x 666

Judges: Per Curiam

Filed Date: 6/29/2009

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024