United States v. Murph-Jackson, Vicki ( 2006 )

UNPUBLISHED ORDER
Not to be cited per Circuit Rule 53
United States Court of Appeals
For the Seventh Circuit
Chicago, Illinois 60604
July 26, 2006
Before
Hon. MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge
Hon. DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge
Hon. DIANE S. SYKES, Circuit Judge
No. 04-1535 Appeal from the United States
District Court for the
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Northern District of Illinois,
Plaintiff-Appellee, Eastern Division.
v. No. 02 CR 635
VICKI MURPH-JACKSON, Charles P. Kocoras,
Defendant-Appellant. Judge.
ORDER
This court ordered a limited remand so the district court could state on the
record whether the sentence remains appropriate now that United States v. Booker,
125 S. Ct. 738 (2005), has limited the Sentencing Guidelines to advisory status. See
United States v. Paladino, 401 F.3d 471 (7th Cir. 2005).
The district judge has now replied that he would today impose the same
sentence, knowing of the Sentencing Guidelines’ advisory status. The parties did
not respond to our invitation to file arguments in this court regarding the district
court’s Paladino remand statement. We do not see any reason why
Murph-Jackson’s sentence of 262 months—at the low end of the Guidelines
range—would be deemed “unreasonable” in post-Booker practice. The judgment of
the district court therefore is AFFIRMED.