United States v. Anthony Rogers , 392 F. App'x 491 ( 2010 )

NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION
To be cited only in accordance with
Fed. R. App. P. 32.1
United States Court of Appeals
For the Seventh Circuit
Chicago, Illinois 60604
Submitted August 12, 2010
Decided August 19, 2010
Before
ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge
DIANE S. SYKES, Circuit Judge
JOHN DANIEL TINDER, Circuit Judge
No. 09-2925 Appeal from the
United States District Court for the
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Northern District of Indiana,
Plaintiff-Appellee, Fort Wayne Division.
v. No. 1:03cr78-001
ANTHONY L. ROGERS, James T. Moody,
Defendant-Appellant. Judge.
ORDER
Anthony Rogers appeals from an order revoking his supervised release and
sentencing him to a term of reimprisonment without further supervised release. Our review
of the case suggested that Rogers was released from prison shortly after his appellate
counsel moved to withdraw under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), so we questioned
whether the appeal was moot. We asked counsel to file a supplemental statement
addressing that point. Counsel confirms that Rogers has been released from custody
without further supervision and states that he is not aware of any collateral consequences of
the revocation.
No. 09-2925 Page 2
Because Rogers has already completed his sentence and faces no collateral
consequences of the revocation of supervised release, this appeal can no longer provide him
any relief. See Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 7, 14 (1998); United States v. Hardy, 545 F.3d 280,
283-85 (4th Cir. 2008); United States v. Mazzillo, 373 F.3d 181, 182 (1st Cir. 2004); United States
v. Trotter, 270 F.3d 1150, 1152-53 (7th Cir. 2001); United States v. Shabazz, 230 F.3d 899, 901
(7th Cir. 2000). Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED as moot.