United States v. Anthony Rogers ( 2011 )


Menu:
  •                           NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION
    To be cited only in accordance with
    Fed. R. App. P. 32.1
    United States Court of Appeals
    For the Seventh Circuit
    Chicago, Illinois 60604
    Submitted August 12, 2010
    Decided August 19, 2010
    Before
    ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge
    DIANE S. SYKES, Circuit Judge
    JOHN DANIEL TINDER, Circuit Judge
    No. 09-2925                                     Appeal from the
    United States District Court for the
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                       Northern District of Indiana,
    Plaintiff-Appellee,                        Fort Wayne Division.
    v.                                       No. 1:03cr78-001
    ANTHONY L. ROGERS,                              James T. Moody,
    Defendant-Appellant.                        Judge.
    ORDER
    Anthony Rogers appeals from an order revoking his supervised release and
    sentencing him to a term of reimprisonment without further supervised release. Our review
    of the case suggested that Rogers was released from prison shortly after his appellate
    counsel moved to withdraw under Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
    (1967), so we questioned
    whether the appeal was moot. We asked counsel to file a supplemental statement
    addressing that point. Counsel confirms that Rogers has been released from custody
    without further supervision and states that he is not aware of any collateral consequences of
    the revocation.
    No. 09-2925                                                                                 Page 2
    Because Rogers has already completed his sentence and faces no collateral
    consequences of the revocation of supervised release, this appeal can no longer provide him
    any relief. See Spencer v. Kemna, 
    523 U.S. 1
    , 7, 14 (1998); United States v. Hardy, 
    545 F.3d 280
    ,
    283-85 (4th Cir. 2008); United States v. Mazzillo, 
    373 F.3d 181
    , 182 (1st Cir. 2004); United States
    v. Trotter, 
    270 F.3d 1150
    , 1152-53 (7th Cir. 2001); United States v. Shabazz, 
    230 F.3d 899
    , 901
    (7th Cir. 2000). Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED as moot.