United States v. Pedro Hernandez ( 2012 )


Menu:
  •                        NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION
    To be cited only in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1
    United States Court of Appeals
    For the Seventh Circuit
    Chicago, Illinois 60604
    Submitted July 31, 2012
    Decided October 3, 2012
    Before
    DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge
    JOHN DANIEL TINDER, Circuit Judge*
    No. 11-1752
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                          On Remand from the Supreme Court of
    Plaintiff-Appellee,               the United States
    v.                                          Appeal from the United States District
    Court for the Northern District of
    PEDRO HERNANDEZ,                                   Illinois, Eastern Division
    Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 08 CR 832
    Amy J. St. Eve, Judge
    ORDER
    *
    Circuit Judge Terence T. Evans was a member of the original panel in this case. He
    died on August 10, 2011, and thus did not participate in the decision of this case on remand
    from the Supreme Court. The case is now being resolved by a quorum of the panel under
    
    28 U.S.C. § 46
    (d).
    No. 11-1752                                                                              Page 2
    On July 31, 2012, the Supreme Court of the United States granted Pedro Hernandez’s
    petition for a writ of certiorari, vacated this court’s judgment in the case, and remanded for
    further consideration in light of Dorsey v. United States, 567 U.S. –, 
    132 S. Ct. 2321
     (2012). In
    accordance with Circuit Rule 54, both parties have filed statements of position setting forth
    the action that they believe should be taken. The Government concedes that Hernandez
    was sentenced after August 3, 2010, for an offense involving cocaine base, and that under
    Dorsey he should have been sentenced within the statutory penalties set by the Fair
    Sentencing Act of 2010. Following the law that then prevailed in this circuit, the district
    court had not done so. The Government now concedes that this error was not harmless,
    because the court imposed a sentence at the old mandatory minimum and did not indicate
    either way whether it would have necessarily given a lower sentence. Hernandez also
    argues that he is entitled to resentencing in a manner consistent with the Fair Sentencing
    Act and Dorsey.
    We agree with the assessments of both parties. We thus VACATE Hernandez’s sentence
    and REMAND this case to the district court for the Northern District of Illinois for re-
    sentencing under the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010, as required by Dorsey.
    SO ORDERED.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 11-1752

Filed Date: 10/4/2012

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014