United States v. Stephen Golden ( 2011 )


Menu:
  •                            NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION
    To be cited only in accordance with
    Fed. R. App. P. 32.1
    United States Court of Appeals
    For the Seventh Circuit
    Chicago, Illinois 60604
    Submitted September 24, 2009
    Decided November 12, 2009
    Amended November 13, 2009
    Before
    WILLIAM J. BAUER, Circuit Judge
    JOEL M. FLAUM, Circuit Judge
    DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                           ]   Appeal from the United
    Plaintiff-Appellee,                         ]   States District Court for
    ]   the Northern District of
    No. 09-1349                           v.            ]   Indiana, Hammond Division.
    ]
    STEPHEN GOLDEN,                                     ]   No. 2:94-cr-00086-RL
    Defendant-Appellant.                        ]
    ]   Rudy Lozano, Judge.
    AMENDED ORDER
    A § 3582(c)(2) request for sentence modification is discretionary, United States v.
    Cunningham, 
    554 F.3d 703
    , 707 (7th Cir. 2009), even for defendant Stephen Golden whose
    Guideline range was lowered to 360 months to life from a range of life. And despite
    Golden’s argument to the contrary, a district judge is permitted to leave a sentence alone,
    
    id., which is
    what the judge did in Golden’s case. The district judge did not abuse his
    discretion in handling Golden’s § 3582(c)(2) motion, especially in light of Golden’s
    admitted incidents of prison misconduct. And, like his decision whether to grant a
    sentence reduction, the district judge’s decision not to conduct a hearing is committed to
    his discretion. United States v. Young, 
    555 F.3d 611
    , 615 (7th Cir. 2009).
    AFFIRMED .
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 09-1349

Filed Date: 12/22/2011

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021