Terrance McCauley-Bey v. Chicago Police Department ( 2022 )


Menu:
  •                         NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION
    To be cited only in accordance with FED. R. APP. P. 32.1
    United States Court of Appeals
    For the Seventh Circuit
    Chicago, Illinois 60604
    Submitted April 4, 2022*
    Decided April 8, 2022
    Before
    WILLIAM J. BAUER, Circuit Judge
    AMY J. ST. EVE, Circuit Judge
    THOMAS L. KIRSCH II, Circuit Judge
    No. 21-2149
    TERRANCE A. McCAULEY-BEY,                        Appeal from the United States District
    Plaintiff-Appellant,                        Court for the Northern District of Illinois,
    Eastern Division.
    v.                                        1:20-cv-07744
    MARY E. MEURIS, et al.,                          Charles R. Norgle,
    Defendants-Appellees.                        Judge.
    ORDER
    Terrance McCauley-Bey, who describes himself as Moorish-American, filed a
    civil rights suit seeking damages for a traffic stop and detention that he believes to have
    been unlawful. He alleged that he was pulled over by Chicago police and then arrested
    and detained after providing a card that identified him as a member of the Moorish
    nation. He asserted that the defendants (including the Chicago Police Department and
    We have agreed to decide the case without oral argument because the issues
    *
    have been authoritatively decided. FED. R. APP. P. 34(a)(2)(B).
    No. 21-2149                                                                            Page 2
    the Illinois Toll Authority) infringed upon his unalienable right to travel; subjected him
    to a tax (in the form of tolls or fines); and denied him the right to “treaty benefits” when
    they seized his car and forced him into “unlawful proceedings in a tribunal not
    competent to hear matters related to international affairs.” The district court, comparing
    McCauley-Bey’s suit to those brought by “sovereign citizens,” dismissed his complaint
    for failure to state a claim.
    On appeal McCauley-Bey essentially argues that his status as a “Moorish
    American national” placed him outside the laws or authority of Illinois and Chicago.
    But as we have reiterated, arguments that a defendant is sovereign and beyond the
    jurisdiction of the courts “should be rejected summarily, however they are presented.”
    United States v. Benabe, 
    654 F.3d 753
    , 767 (7th Cir. 2011) (collecting cases); John Jones Bey
    v. Indiana, 
    847 F.3d 559
    , 560 (7th Cir. 2017).
    AFFIRMED
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 21-2149

Judges: Per Curiam

Filed Date: 4/8/2022

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/13/2022