United States v. Herman Ronnfeldt ( 2022 )


Menu:
  •                   United States Court of Appeals
    For the Eighth Circuit
    ___________________________
    No. 21-2520
    ___________________________
    United States of America
    lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
    v.
    Herman Lee Ronnfeldt
    lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
    ____________
    Appeal from United States District Court
    for the Northern District of Iowa - Eastern
    ____________
    Submitted: February 10, 2022
    Filed: February 15, 2022
    [Unpublished]
    ____________
    Before COLLOTON, SHEPHERD, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.
    ____________
    PER CURIAM.
    Herman Ronnfeldt appeals the sentence the district court1 imposed after he pled
    guilty to a drug offense. His counsel moved to withdraw and filed a brief under
    1
    The Honorable C.J. Williams, United States District Judge for the Northern
    District of Iowa.
    Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
     (1967), challenging the district court’s decision
    to depart upward based on Ronnfeldt’s criminal history and arguing the sentence is
    substantively unreasonable.
    After careful review of the record, we conclude the district court did not abuse
    its discretion in departing upward. See U.S.S.G. § 4A1.3(a)(1) (“If reliable
    information indicates that the defendant’s criminal history category substantially
    under-represents the seriousness of the defendant’s criminal history or the likelihood
    that the defendant will commit other crimes, an upward departure may be
    warranted.”); United States v. King, 
    627 F.3d 321
    , 323 (8th Cir. 2010) (standard of
    review). We also conclude the sentence is substantively reasonable. See United
    States v. Brown, 
    992 F.3d 665
    , 673 (8th Cir. 2021) (standard of review); United
    States v. Jones, 
    639 F.3d 484
    , 488 (8th Cir. 2011) (noting a sentence within the
    advisory United States Sentencing Guidelines Manual range, even one following a
    § 4A1.3 upward departure, enjoys presumption of reasonableness).
    Further, having independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 
    488 U.S. 75
     (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we grant
    counsel leave to withdraw and affirm.
    ______________________________
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 21-2520

Filed Date: 2/15/2022

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 2/15/2022