United States v. Vinh Xuan Ngo , 690 F. App'x 452 ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •                  United States Court of Appeals
    For the Eighth Circuit
    ___________________________
    No. 16-3890
    ___________________________
    United States of America
    lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee
    v.
    Vinh Xuan Ngo
    lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant
    ____________
    Appeal from United States District Court
    for the District of Minnesota - St. Paul
    ____________
    Submitted: June 6, 2017
    Filed: June 6, 2017
    [Unpublished]
    ____________
    Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
    ____________
    PER CURIAM.
    Pursuant to a written plea agreement that included an appeal waiver, Vinh
    Xuan Ngo pleaded guilty to charges of aiding and abetting bank fraud and aggravated
    identity theft. The district court1 sentenced him below the calculated Guidelines
    range to 114 months in prison, and Ngo appeals. His counsel has moved to withdraw,
    and in a brief submitted under Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
    (1967), counsel
    argues that the sentence is unreasonable, and asks that this court consider whether the
    appeal waiver should be enforced in this case.
    Having carefully considered the record, we conclude that the appeal waiver is
    enforceable and should be enforced. See United States v. Scott, 
    627 F.3d 702
    , 704
    (8th Cir. 2010) (de novo review). At the plea hearing, the district court carefully and
    thoroughly questioned Ngo to ensure that he was entering into the plea agreement and
    the appeal waiver knowingly and voluntarily, see Nguyen v. United States, 
    114 F.3d 699
    , 703 (8th Cir. 1997); this appeal falls within the scope of the broadly worded
    appeal waiver; and no miscarriage of justice would result from enforcing the waiver,
    see United States v. Andis, 
    333 F.3d 886
    , 890-92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc). Further,
    we have reviewed the record independently under Penson v. Ohio, 
    488 U.S. 75
    (1988), and find no non-frivolous issues for appeal outside the scope of the waiver.
    Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we dismiss this
    appeal.
    ______________________________
    1
    The Honorable Patrick J. Schiltz, United States District Judge for the District
    of Minnesota.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 16-3890

Citation Numbers: 690 F. App'x 452

Judges: Loken, Murphy, Benton

Filed Date: 6/6/2017

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024