United States v. Edward Stieber , 641 F. App'x 662 ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •                 United States Court of Appeals
    For the Eighth Circuit
    ___________________________
    No. 15-3452
    ___________________________
    United States of America
    lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee
    v.
    Edward Allen Stieber, also known as Eddie Stieber, also known as Kool_uncle,
    also known as hardtohandle4u
    lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant
    ____________
    Appeal from United States District Court
    for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City
    ____________
    Submitted: March 17, 2016
    Filed: April 11, 2016
    [Unpublished]
    ____________
    Before WOLLMAN, ARNOLD, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
    ____________
    PER CURIAM.
    Edward Stieber appeals the sentence that the district court1 imposed on him
    after he pleaded guilty to two counts of attempting to produce child pornography. See
    
    18 U.S.C. § 2251
    (a) and (e). He maintains, first, that his within-Guidelines sentence
    is substantively unreasonable because it was based primarily on uncharged conduct
    and potential future criminal conduct. A sentencing court, however, may consider
    relevant, uncharged conduct, United States v. Pratt, 
    553 F.3d 1165
    , 1170 (8th Cir.
    2009), and should consider the need to protect the public from future crimes by the
    defendant. 
    18 U.S.C. § 3553
    (a)(2)(C). Our review of the sentencing-hearing transcript
    does not reveal that the district court gave undue weight to these considerations. Our
    precedents foreclose Stieber's second argument, that the district court should have
    considered his potential eligibility for civil commitment in fixing his sentence. See
    United States v. Jeffries, 
    615 F.3d 909
    , 911–12 (8th Cir. 2010). We therefore
    conclude that Stieber has failed to rebut the presumption that his within-Guidelines
    sentence, which was based upon a proper consideration of the matters contained in
    § 3553(a), is reasonable. See Gall v. United States, 
    552 U.S. 38
    , 40 (2007).
    Affirmed.
    ______________________________
    1
    The Honorable Beth Phillips, United States District Judge for the Western
    District of Missouri.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 15-3452

Citation Numbers: 641 F. App'x 662

Judges: Wollman, Arnold, Shepherd

Filed Date: 4/11/2016

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024