Stacy Abram, IV v. Mike Allen , 598 F. App'x 480 ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                  United States Court of Appeals
    For the Eighth Circuit
    ___________________________
    No. 14-2970
    ___________________________
    Stacy S. Abram, IV
    lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
    v.
    Mike Allen, Sheriff, Crittenden County Arkansas; State of Arkansas; Wendy
    Kelley,1 Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
    lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees
    ____________
    Appeal from United States District Court
    for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Jonesboro
    ____________
    Submitted: April 1, 2015
    Filed: April 14, 2015
    [Unpublished]
    ____________
    Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
    ____________
    PER CURIAM.
    1
    Wendy Kelley has been appointed to serve as Director of the Arkansas
    Department of Correction, and is substituted as appellee pursuant to Federal Rule of
    Appellate Procedure 43(c).
    Stacy Abram appeals after the district court2 denied his 
    28 U.S.C. § 2254
    petition as untimely. The district court granted a certificate of appealability (COA)
    as to whether a possible jurisdictional problem with the judgment of conviction in the
    state trial court affected the timeliness analysis. After careful de novo review, we
    conclude that the district court’s dismissal was proper. See 
    28 U.S.C. § 2244
    (d)(1)(A) (habeas application challenging state court judgment must be filed
    within 1 year of the date on which conviction became final); Holland v. Florida, 
    560 U.S. 631
    , 649-52 (2010) (§ 2254 petitioner is entitled to equitable tolling when he
    establishes he diligently pursued his rights and some extraordinary circumstance
    stood in his way of filing a timely petition); Camacho v. Hobbs, 
    774 F.3d 931
    , 932
    (8th Cir. 2015) (standard of review); Johnson v. Hobbs, 
    678 F.3d 607
    , 610-11 (8th
    Cir. 2012) (extraordinary circumstance must be external and not attributable to
    petitioner); cf. Barreto-Barreto v. United States, 
    551 F.3d 95
    , 100 (1st Cir. 2008)
    (§ 2255 motion claiming trial court lacked jurisdiction must be filed within limitation
    period).
    The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
    ______________________________
    2
    The Honorable D.P. Marshall Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern
    District of Arkansas.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-2970

Citation Numbers: 598 F. App'x 480

Judges: Wollman, Murphy, Gruender

Filed Date: 4/14/2015

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024