United States v. Tondrell Gary, Jr. ( 2019 )


Menu:
  •                  United States Court of Appeals
    For the Eighth Circuit
    ___________________________
    No. 19-1971
    ___________________________
    United States of America
    lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
    v.
    Tondrell Darnez Gary, Jr.
    lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
    ____________
    Appeal from United States District Court
    for the Northern District of Iowa - Waterloo
    ____________
    Submitted: December 9, 2019
    Filed: December 12, 2019
    [Unpublished]
    ____________
    Before LOKEN, SHEPHERD, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges.
    ____________
    PER CURIAM.
    Tondrell Gary appeals the sentence imposed by the district court1 after he
    pleaded guilty to a firearm offense. His counsel has moved for leave to withdraw,
    1
    The Honorable C. J. Williams, United States District Judge for the Northern
    District of Iowa.
    and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
     (1967), arguing that the
    sentence was unreasonable.
    Upon careful review, we conclude that the district court did not impose a
    substantively unreasonable sentence. See United States v. Feemster, 
    572 F.3d 455
    ,
    461-62 (8th Cir. 2009) (sentences are reviewed for substantive reasonableness under
    deferential abuse of discretion standard; abuse of discretion occurs when court fails
    to consider relevant factor, gives significant weight to improper or irrelevant factor,
    or commits clear error of judgment in weighing appropriate factors). The record
    establishes that the district court adequately considered the sentencing factors listed
    in 
    18 U.S.C. § 3553
    (a). See United States v. Wohlman, 
    651 F.3d 878
    , 887 (8th Cir.
    2011) (court need not mechanically recite § 3553(a) factors, so long as it is clear from
    record that court actually considered them in determining sentence).
    We have also independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 
    488 U.S. 75
     (1988), and we find no non-frivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we
    affirm the judgment, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.
    ______________________________
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 19-1971

Filed Date: 12/12/2019

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 12/12/2019