Jeffrey Gorman v. Michael J. Astrue , 407 F. App'x 68 ( 2011 )


Menu:
  •                       United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 10-1898
    ___________
    Jeffrey J. Gorman,                   *
    *
    Appellant,              *
    * Appeal from the United States
    v.                             * District Court for the Western
    * District of Missouri.
    Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner      *
    of Social Security,                  * [UNPUBLISHED]
    *
    Appellee.               *
    ___________
    Submitted: January 5, 2011
    Filed: January 10, 2011
    ___________
    Before BYE, BOWMAN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    Jeffrey J. Gorman appeals the district court’s1 order affirming the determination
    that he is not entitled to a waiver of recovery of overpaid disability insurance benefits.
    After careful review of the record and Gorman’s arguments for reversal, see Davidson
    v. Astrue, 
    501 F.3d 987
    , 989-90 (8th Cir. 2007) (de novo review), we find that the
    administrative law judge’s (ALJ’s) credibility determination is entitled to deference,
    1
    The Honorable Robert E. Larsen, United States Magistrate Judge for the
    Western District of Missouri, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by
    consent of the parties pursuant to 
    28 U.S.C. § 636
    (c).
    as it was based on several valid reasons, see Juszczyk v. Astrue, 
    542 F.3d 626
    , 632
    (8th Cir. 2008); we find no evidence of bias on the part of the ALJ, see Rollins v.
    Massanari, 
    261 F.3d 853
    , 857-58 (9th Cir. 2001) (quasi-judicial administrative
    officers such as ALJs are presumed unbiased, but presumption can be rebutted by
    showing conflict of interest or other specific reason for disqualification); and we reject
    as meritless Gorman’s argument that he was denied due process. We thus agree with
    the district court that Gorman failed to meet his burden of establishing that he was
    without fault for the overpayment. See Coulston v. Apfel, 
    224 F.3d 897
    , 900 (8th Cir.
    2000) (per curiam) (burden is on claimant to prove entitlement to waiver of
    repayment); see also 
    20 C.F.R. § 404.507
     (even if Social Security Administration is
    at fault for making overpayment, claimant is not relieved from liability for repayment
    if he himself is not without fault). Accordingly, we affirm.
    ______________________________
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 10-1898

Citation Numbers: 407 F. App'x 68

Judges: Bye, Bowman, Colloton

Filed Date: 1/10/2011

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024