United States v. Lance Cummings , 420 F. App'x 662 ( 2011 )


Menu:
  •                     United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 11-1257
    ___________
    United States of America,               *
    *
    Appellee,                   *
    * Appeal from the United States
    v.                                * District Court for the
    * Eastern District of Arkansas.
    Lance Dewayne Cummings,                 *
    * [UNPUBLISHED]
    Appellant.                  *
    ___________
    Submitted: July 6, 2011
    Filed: July 15, 2011
    ___________
    Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    Lance Cummings pleaded guilty to possessing with intent to distribute more
    than 50 grams but less than 500 grams of a methamphetamine mixture, in violation of
    21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). The district court1 sentenced him to the statutory minimum
    of 60 months in prison and 4 years of supervised release. Cummings appeals. His
    counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief under Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
    (1967), arguing that the court erred denying safety-valve relief under 18 U.S.C.
    1
    The Honorable Brian S. Miller, United States District Judge for the Eastern
    District of Arkansas.
    § 3553(f)(5) and USSG § 5C1.2(a)(5), and in declining to decrease his offense level
    based on a mitigating role in the offense, pursuant to USSG § 3B1.2.
    We conclude that the district court did not clearly err by finding that Cummings
    had not truthfully provided all information he had concerning the offense, and thus did
    not satisfy the safety-valve requirements. See United States v. Alvarado-Rivera, 
    412 F.3d 942
    , 947 (8th Cir. 2005) (en banc). Because Cummings was subject to a
    statutory minimum penalty of 60 months’ imprisonment, his challenge to the district
    court’s decision on a minor-role reduction is moot. United States v. Bolanos, 
    409 F.3d 1045
    , 1049 (8th Cir. 2005).
    Having reviewed the record independently under Penson v. Ohio, 
    488 U.S. 75
    (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment, and we
    grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.
    ______________________________
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 11-1257

Citation Numbers: 420 F. App'x 662

Judges: Loken, Murphy, Colloton

Filed Date: 7/15/2011

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024