LaRonda Phox v. Virtuoso Sourcing Group, LLC ( 2018 )


Menu:
  •                United States Court of Appeals
    For the Eighth Circuit
    ___________________________
    No. 17-3254
    ___________________________
    LaRonda Phox
    lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
    v.
    Virtuoso Sourcing Group, LLC
    lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee
    ____________
    Appeal from United States District Court
    for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City
    ____________
    Submitted: June 25, 2018
    Filed: July 2, 2018
    [Unpublished]
    ____________
    Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
    ____________
    PER CURIAM.
    LaRonda Phox appeals after the district court1 entered an order imposing
    restrictions on future filings, and entered an order dismissing her complaint without
    prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6).
    We conclude that the district court did not err in dismissing Phox’s complaint.
    See Plymouth Cty. v. Merscorp, Inc., 
    774 F.3d 1155
    , 1158 (8th Cir. 2014) (reviewing
    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) dismissal de novo); see also Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 
    556 U.S. 662
    ,
    678 (2009) (requiring plaintiff’s complaint to contain sufficient factual matter to state
    a claim to relief that is plausible on its face); Dunham v. Portfolio Recovery Assocs.,
    LLC, 
    663 F.3d 997
    , 1001 (8th Cir. 2011) (discussing Fair Debt Collection Practices
    Act); Poehl v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., 
    528 F.3d 1093
    , 1096 (8th Cir. 2008)
    (discussing Fair Credit Reporting Act).
    Given Phox’s history of filing frivolous lawsuits, we also find no abuse of
    discretion in the district court’s imposition of the filing restrictions. See In re Tyler,
    
    839 F.2d 1290
    , 1290-95 (8th Cir. 1988) (per curiam) (noting that courts have
    discretion to place reasonable restrictions on litigant who abuses judicial process); see
    also Peck v. Hoff, 
    660 F.2d 371
    , 374 (8th Cir. 1981) (per curiam) (reviewing filing
    restriction for abuse of discretion).
    Accordingly, we affirm the order dismissing Phox’s complaint, and we affirm
    the order imposing filing restrictions.
    ______________________________
    1
    The Honorable Greg Kays, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the
    Western District of Missouri.
    -2-