United States v. Austin Alexander ( 2013 )

United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 13-1741
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
Austin Adolf Alexander
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Western District of Arkansas - Harrison
____________
Submitted: October 2, 2013
Filed: October 9, 2013
[Unpublished]
____________
Before SMITH, BOWMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Austin Alexander appeals from the thirty-month sentence that the District
1
Court imposed after Alexander pleaded guilty to manufacturing counterfeit currency,
1
The Honorable P. K. Holmes, III, Chief Judge, United States District Court for
the Western District of Arkansas.
18 U.S.C. § 471. On appeal, Alexander’s counsel has moved to withdraw and has
filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the
substantive reasonableness of the sentence.
Upon careful review, we conclude that the court did not impose an unreasonable
sentence. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007) (describing appellate
review of sentences under the deferential abuse-of-discretion standard and noting that
if a sentence is within the Guidelines range, the appellate court may apply a
presumption of reasonableness); see also United States v. Werlein, 664 F.3d 1143,
1146 (8th Cir. 2011) (per curiam) (explaining that if an appellant does not argue that
the district court committed procedural error, we proceed directly to a review of the
substantive reasonableness of the sentence).
We have reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988),
and we have found no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we affirm
Alexander’s sentence, and we grant counsel leave to withdraw.
______________________________
-2-