United States v. William Andrews ( 2019 )


Menu:
  •                  United States Court of Appeals
    For the Eighth Circuit
    ___________________________
    No. 18-3273
    ___________________________
    United States of America
    Plaintiff - Appellee
    v.
    William Andrews
    Defendant – Appellant
    ____________
    Appeal from United States District Court
    for the District of South Dakota - Rapid City
    ____________
    Submitted: June 28, 2019
    Filed: July 3, 2019
    [Unpublished]
    ____________
    Before COLLOTON, ERICKSON, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.
    ____________
    PER CURIAM.
    A jury convicted William Andrews of being a felon in possession of a firearm,
    18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1), 924(a)(2). In an Anders brief, Andrews’s counsel requests
    permission to withdraw and questions the district court’s 1 decision to admit evidence
    that Andrews had previously been convicted of a felony involving a firearm. See
    Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
    (1967).
    We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in admitting
    this evidence. See United States v. Rembert, 
    851 F.3d 836
    , 839 (8th Cir. 2017)
    (explaining that a court’s admission of prior-bad-act evidence under Federal Rule of
    Evidence 404(b) will be reversed “only when such evidence clearly ha[d] no bearing
    on the issues in the case and was introduced solely to prove the defendant’s
    propensity to commit criminal acts” (citation omitted)). Evidence that Andrews had
    previously possessed a gun was relevant to show that he knowingly possessed the
    gun recovered in this case. See United States v. Halk, 
    634 F.3d 482
    , 487 (8th Cir.
    2011). And the court’s limiting instruction to the jury helped “diminish[] the danger
    of any unfair prejudice arising from [its] admission.” 
    Id. at 488
    (citation omitted).
    We have also independently reviewed the record and conclude that no other
    non-frivolous issues exist. See Penson v. Ohio, 
    488 U.S. 75
    (1988). Accordingly,
    we affirm the judgment and grant counsel permission to withdraw.
    ______________________________
    1
    The Honorable Lawrence L. Piersol, United States District Judge for the
    District of South Dakota.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 18-3273

Filed Date: 7/3/2019

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 7/3/2019