Jimy Menendez Castillo v. Eric H. Holder, Jr. , 541 F. App'x 731 ( 2013 )


Menu:
  •                  United States Court of Appeals
    For the Eighth Circuit
    ___________________________
    No. 13-1496
    ___________________________
    Jimy Henry Menendez Castillo; Gloria M. Donis De Menendez
    lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioners
    v.
    Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General of the United States
    lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent
    ____________
    Petition for Review of an Order of the
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    ____________
    Submitted: November 14, 2013
    Filed: November 15, 2013
    [Unpublished]
    ____________
    Before MURPHY, SMITH, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
    ____________
    PER CURIAM.
    Guatemalan citizens Jimy Menendez Castillo and Gloria Donis de Menendez
    petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), which
    upheld an immigration judge’s adverse decision. After careful consideration of the
    petition, we find no basis for reversal.
    First, we conclude that we lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s denial of
    cancellation of removal. See Zacarias-Velasquez v. Mukasey, 
    509 F.3d 429
    , 434 (8th
    Cir. 2007) (this court lacks jurisdiction to review denial of cancellation of removal
    for failure to prove exceptional and extremely unusual hardship); see also
    Gomez-Perez v. Holder, 
    569 F.3d 370
    , 372-73 (8th Cir. 2009) (jurisdictional bar
    applied to petitioner’s argument that BIA had applied “an incorrect legal standard,”
    as petitioner was merely challenging BIA’s discretionary conclusion that
    circumstances did not merit cancellation of removal). Second, we conclude that
    substantial evidence supported the BIA’s decision to deny asylum, withholding of
    removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (CAT).                   See
    Khrystotodorov v. Mukasey, 
    551 F.3d 775
    , 781, 784 (8th Cir. 2008) (this court
    upholds denial of asylum if it is supported by substantial evidence; denial of asylum
    dictates same outcome on withholding-of-removal and CAT claims based on same
    underlying factual allegations).
    Accordingly, the petition for review is denied. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
    ______________________________
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-1496

Citation Numbers: 541 F. App'x 731

Judges: Murphy, Smith, Shepherd

Filed Date: 11/15/2013

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024