Mark Crowley v. Maqez Nailor ( 2019 )


Menu:
  •                United States Court of Appeals
    For the Eighth Circuit
    ___________________________
    No. 19-1293
    ___________________________
    Mark Daniel Crowley,
    lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    Maqez D. Nailor, Sergeant, Cummins Unit, ADC (Originally named as Nailor);
    LaToya Woods, Corporal, Cummins Unit, ADC (Originally named as Woods);
    Kenneth Starks, Captain, Cummins Unit, ADC (Originally named as Stark);
    William Straughn, Warden, Cummins Unit, ADC (Originally named as Straughn);
    Patrick Pierre, Sergeant, Cummins Unit, ADC (Originally named as Pierre),
    lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees.
    ____________
    Appeal from United States District Court
    for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Pine Bluff
    ____________
    Submitted: October 16, 2019
    Filed: November 4, 2019
    [Unpublished]
    ____________
    Before COLLOTON, SHEPHERD, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges.
    ____________
    PER CURIAM.
    Arkansas inmate Mark Crowley appeals an order and judgment of the district
    1
    court dismissing his action under 
    42 U.S.C. § 1983
     for failure to exhaust
    administrative remedies. We agree that Crowley failed to exhaust his claims before
    bringing suit as required by 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). Whether Crowley’s grievances
    were deemed emergent or non-emergent, the prison’s policy allowed inmates to
    appeal even if they received no response to their grievances. As Crowley did not
    appeal after his grievances went unanswered, and he was not prevented from doing
    so, he did not exhaust the process. See Porter, 781 F.3d at 452. Crowley’s mistaken
    belief that an appeal of an unanswered grievance could be submitted only on a
    grievance decision form did not show that the process was unavailable to him. He
    offered no evidence to the district court that prison officials prevented him from
    appealing. See Sergent v. Norris, 
    330 F.3d 1084
    , 1085-86 (8th Cir. 2003) (per
    curiam); Chelette v. Harris, 
    229 F.3d 684
    , 688 (8th Cir. 2000). The judgment is
    affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
    ______________________________
    1
    The Honorable Kristine G. Baker, United States District Judge for the Eastern
    District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Beth
    Deere, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 19-1293

Filed Date: 11/4/2019

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/4/2019