Simon Gebregziabher v. Christopher Tanner ( 2022 )


Menu:
  •                  United States Court of Appeals
    For the Eighth Circuit
    ___________________________
    No. 22-1077
    ___________________________
    Simon Gebregziabher
    lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
    v.
    Francis G. Slay, Mayor and Board of Police Commissioners, Official Capacity;
    Richard Gray, Board of Police Commissioners, Official Capacity; Thomas Irwin,
    Board of Police Commissioners, Official Capacity; Erwin Switzer, Board of Police
    Commissioners, Official Capacity; Marcus Bush, Police Officer, Individual Capacity
    lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants
    Christopher Tanner, Detective, Individual Capacity
    lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee
    Paul Piatchek, LT of the Saint Louis Metropolitan Police Department, Individual
    Capacity; Matthew Burle, Police Officer, Individual Capacity; Mickey Christ,
    Police Officer, Individual Capacity; John Doe, #1 (DSN # unknown)
    lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants
    ____________
    Appeal from United States District Court
    for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis
    ____________
    Submitted: December 15, 2022
    Filed: December 20, 2022
    [Unpublished]
    ____________
    Before LOKEN, GRUENDER, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges.
    ____________
    PER CURIAM.
    Simon Gebregziabher appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary
    judgment, as well as the adverse grant of judgment following a bench trial, as to
    certain excessive force claims in this 
    42 U.S.C. § 1983
     action. Having carefully
    reviewed the record and the parties’ submissions on appeal, we decline to consider
    Gebregziabher’s arguments challenging the adverse grant of summary judgment,
    which were raised for the first time on appeal. See Wever v. Lincoln Cnty., Neb., 
    388 F.3d 601
    , 608 (8th Cir. 2004) (ordinarily, appellate court will not consider arguments
    raised for first time on appeal). We further find no basis for reversal of the district
    court’s judgment following the bench trial. See Story v. Norwood, 
    659 F.3d 680
    ,
    684-85 (8th Cir. 2011) (findings of fact at bench trial reviewed for clear error;
    credibility determinations “virtually unreviewable” on appeal); Mann v. Yarnell, 
    497 F.3d 822
    , 825 (8th Cir. 2007) (reasonableness of official’s conduct under
    circumstances is question of law). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
    ______________________________
    1
    The Honorable Shirley P. Mensah, United States Magistrate Judge for the
    Eastern District of Missouri, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by
    consent of the parties pursuant to 
    28 U.S.C. § 636
    (c).
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 22-1077

Filed Date: 12/20/2022

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 12/20/2022