Vanessa Dundon v. Kyle Kirchmeier , 701 F. App'x 538 ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •                 United States Court of Appeals
    For the Eighth Circuit
    ___________________________
    No. 17-1306
    ___________________________
    Vanessa Dundon; Jade Kalikolehuaokal Wool; Crystal Wilson; David Demo; Guy
    Dullknife, III; Mariah Marie Bruce; Frank Finan; Israel Hoagland-Lynn; Noah
    Michael Treanor, on behalf of themselves and all similarly-situated persons
    lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiffs - Appellants
    v.
    Kyle Kirchmeier; Morton County; City of Mandan; Jason Ziegler; Stutsman
    County; Chad Kaiser; Does 1-100
    lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees
    ------------------------------
    American Civil Liberties Union of North Dakota; American Civil Liberties Union
    of South Dakota
    lllllllllllllllllllllAmici on Behalf of Appellant(s)
    ____________
    Appeal from United States District Court
    for the District of North Dakota - Bismarck
    ____________
    Submitted: October 18, 2017
    Filed: November 14, 2017
    [Unpublished]
    _____________
    Before WOLLMAN, BEAM, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
    ____________
    PER CURIAM.
    Appellants appeal the district court's1 denial of their motion for a preliminary
    injunction, wherein they sought an order prohibiting the appellees from using
    excessive force in responding to pipeline protests and prayer ceremonies. We have
    carefully reviewed the record and the parties' arguments on appeal, and have ensured
    that this dispute was not rendered moot by the completion of any portion of the
    Dakota Access Pipeline in North Dakota. We likewise have thoroughly reviewed the
    district court's analysis of the Dataphase factors in its well-reasoned opinion and find
    no abuse of discretion in the court's denial of injunctive relief. The judgment is
    affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B; see also Dataphase Sys., Inc. v. CL Sys., Inc., 
    640 F.2d 109
    , 114 (8th Cir. 1981) (setting out factors court must weigh to determine
    whether to grant or deny a preliminary injunction); Coyne's & Co., Inc. v. Enesco,
    LLC, 
    553 F.3d 1128
    , 1131 (8th Cir. 2009) (standard of review).
    ______________________________
    1
    The Honorable Daniel L. Hovland, Chief Judge, United States District Court
    for the District of North Dakota.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 17-1306

Citation Numbers: 701 F. App'x 538

Judges: Wollman, Beam, Shepherd

Filed Date: 11/14/2017

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024