United States v. Joseph Thompson ( 2009 )


Menu:
  •                     United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 08-2093
    ___________
    United States of America,              *
    *
    Appellee,                  *
    * Appeal from the United States
    v.                               * District Court for the
    * Western District of Missouri.
    Joseph Thompson,                       *
    * [UNPUBLISHED]
    Appellant.                 *
    ___________
    Submitted: March 19, 2009
    Filed: March 25, 2009
    ___________
    Before RILEY, SMITH, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    Joseph Thompson appeals the district court’s1 order committing him to the
    custody of the Attorney General under 
    18 U.S.C. § 4246
    , and we affirm.
    Section 4246 provides for the indefinite hospitalization of a person who has
    been committed to the custody of the Attorney General under 
    18 U.S.C. § 4241
    (d)
    ¹The Honorable Richard E. Dorr, United States District Judge for the Western
    District of Missouri, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable
    James C. England, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of
    Missouri.
    (concerning mental incompetence to stand trial) and who is found--after a hearing, by
    clear and convincing evidence--to be suffering from a mental disease or defect as a
    result of which his release would create a substantial risk of bodily injury to another
    person or serious damage to property of another. See 
    18 U.S.C. § 4246
    . In this case,
    the district court found that commitment was appropriate because state placement was
    unavailable and the mental health professionals who examined Thompson
    unanimously believed that his limited intelligence, history of substance abuse, and
    antisocial personality disorder, coupled with self-reported hallucinations sometimes
    commanding him to hurt others, created a risk of dangerousness within the meaning
    of section 4246 if Thompson were unconditionally released. We hold that this finding
    is not clearly erroneous. See United States v. Williams, 
    299 F.3d 673
    , 676-77 (8th
    Cir. 2002) (standard of review). We note that Thompson’s custodians are under an
    ongoing obligation to prepare annual reports concerning Thompson’s mental
    condition and the need for his continued hospitalization, see 
    18 U.S.C. § 4247
    (e)(1)(B), and to exert reasonable efforts to place Thompson in a suitable state
    facility, see 
    18 U.S.C. § 4246
    (d).
    The judgment of the district court is affirmed, and counsel’s motion to
    withdraw is granted.
    ______________________________
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 08-2093

Judges: Riley, Smith, Benton

Filed Date: 3/25/2009

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024