Lori Irish v. U.S. Department of Justice , 636 F. App'x 703 ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •                 United States Court of Appeals
    For the Eighth Circuit
    ___________________________
    No. 15-1605
    ___________________________
    Lori Irish
    lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
    v.
    United States Department of Justice; Federal Bureau of Prisons; Officer Pena;
    Lieutenant Duncan; Lieutenant Omelson; Unknown Federal Bureau of Prison
    Employees; Officer G. Duffy
    lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees
    ____________
    Appeal from United States District Court
    for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis
    ____________
    Submitted: January 27, 2016
    Filed: February 9, 2016
    [Unpublished]
    ____________
    Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and BYE, Circuit Judges.
    ____________
    PER CURIAM.
    Former federal inmate Lori Irish appeals following the district court’s1 adverse
    grant of summary judgment in her action under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named
    Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 
    403 U.S. 388
    (1971), and the Federal Tort
    Claims Act. Irish’s primary challenge on appeal is to the magistrate judge’s orders
    on nondispositive matters, but because she did not seek review by the district court,
    this court lacks jurisdiction to consider her challenge. See Daley v. Mariott Int’l, Inc.,
    
    415 F.3d 889
    , 893 n.9 (8th Cir. 2005) (where parties do not consent to final
    disposition by magistrate judge, this court lacks jurisdiction to hear direct appeal of
    magistrate judge’s order on nondispositive pretrial matter). As to the claims that Irish
    has properly put before us with adequate briefing, see Hess v. Ables, 
    714 F.3d 1048
    ,
    1051 n.2 (8th Cir. 2013) (claim is waived where there is no briefing as to why
    dismissal was improper), we have conducted the requisite de novo review, see Holt
    v. Howard, 
    806 F.3d 1129
    , 1132 (8th Cir. 2015), and carefully considered Irish’s
    arguments, and we find no basis for reversal. The judgment of the district court is
    affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
    ______________________________
    1
    The Honorable Michael J. Davis, United States District Judge for the District
    of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Jeffrey J.
    Keyes, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 15-1605

Citation Numbers: 636 F. App'x 703

Filed Date: 2/9/2016

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 1/13/2023