United States v. Luis Rodriguez , 498 F. App'x 657 ( 2013 )


Menu:
  •                   United States Court of Appeals
    For the Eighth Circuit
    ___________________________
    No. 12-2382
    ___________________________
    United States of America
    lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee
    v.
    Luis Rodriguez
    lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant
    ____________
    Appeal from United States District Court
    for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City
    ____________
    Submitted: February 7, 2013
    Filed: February 13, 2013
    [Unpublished]
    ____________
    Before LOKEN, MELLOY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
    ____________
    PER CURIAM.
    After Luis Rodriguez had served a portion of the supervised-release term
    imposed as part of his sentence for a federal bank-robbery offense, he moved for early
    termination of supervised release, arguing that he had adjusted well to supervision,
    had completed all required programs, and had met all rules and regulations. The
    district court1 denied the motion, and this appeal followed. After careful review of
    the record, counsel’s brief, and Rodriguez’s pro se brief, we affirm.
    In the proceedings below, both the government and the probation officer who
    was supervising Rodriguez opposed early termination. The probation officer, in
    particular, noted in his written report to the court that Rodriguez had failed to make
    several payments toward the large restitution obligation that was part of his criminal
    sentence and incorporated in his supervised-release conditions. Noting that it had
    considered the record and the parties’ arguments, the court stated that it had decided
    to deny early termination, in part because the court believed that supervised release
    would provide Rodriguez with more time and structure to meet his restitution
    obligation. In these circumstances, we see no abuse of discretion in the denial of
    early termination. See 
    18 U.S.C. § 3583
    (e)(1); United States v. Lowe, 
    632 F.3d 996
    ,
    997-98 (7th Cir. 2011) (denial of motion for early termination of supervised release
    is reviewed for abuse of discretion).
    Accordingly, we affirm. We also grant counsel leave to withdraw.
    ______________________________
    1
    The Honorable Dean Whipple, United States District Judge for the Western
    District of Missouri.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 12-2382

Citation Numbers: 498 F. App'x 657

Judges: Loken, Melloy, Benton

Filed Date: 2/13/2013

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024