United States v. Sammie White ( 1997 )


Menu:
  •                          United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 96-3949
    ___________
    United States of America,            *
    *
    Appellee,                  *
    * Appeal from the United States
    v.                               * District Court for the
    * Eastern District of Missouri.
    Sammie White, also known as Punkin, *       [UNPUBLISHED]
    *
    Appellant.                 *
    ___________
    Submitted: September 4, 1997
    Filed: September 26, 1997
    ___________
    Before WOLLMAN, MAGILL, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    After a jury convicted Sammie White of possessing cocaine with intent to
    distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), and of using and carrying firearms
    during and in relation to cocaine trafficking, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c), the
    district court1 sentenced him to consecutive prison terms of 70 months on the drug-
    trafficking count and 60 months on the gun count, to be followed by 3 years supervised
    1
    The Honorable Edward L. Filippine, United States District Judge for the Eastern
    District of Missouri.
    release. We affirmed White&s sentence. See United States v. White, No. 92-3721,
    
    1993 WL 128010
    , at *1 (8th Cir. Apr. 26, 1993) (unpublished per curiam). The district
    court later vacated White&s gun conviction, enhanced his drug sentence by 2 levels
    pursuant to U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 2D1.1(b)(1) (1995) (add 2 levels if
    dangerous weapon, including firearm, was possessed), calculated a corresponding
    amended sentencing range of 87 to 108 months, and resentenced White to 90 months
    imprisonment and 3 years supervised release. On appeal, White&s counsel has filed a
    brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
    (1967). We affirm.
    Counsel argues that the district court erred in applying the firearm enhancement.
    We conclude that the court did not clearly err in assessing the enhancement, because
    the court was entitled on resentencing to credit the government&s evidence adduced at
    trial that White owned three firearms--two of which were loaded--seized from his
    residence; that he also owned approximately 415 grams of cocaine found at the
    residence; and that White intended to distribute the cocaine. See U.S. Sentencing
    Guidelines Manual § 2D1.1, comment. (n.3) (1995) (firearm-possession enhancement
    “should be applied if the weapon was present, unless it is clearly improbable that the
    weapon was connected with the offense”); United States v. McCracken, 
    110 F.3d 535
    ,
    541-42 (8th Cir. 1997) (standard of review; affirming enhancement where firearms and
    drugs were found in defendants& residence); United States v. Dailey, 
    918 F.2d 747
    , 748
    (8th Cir. 1990) (district court may rely upon evidence presented at trial in making
    sentencing determinations).
    After reviewing the record for any nonfrivolous issues, see Penson v. Ohio, 
    488 U.S. 75
    , 80 (1988), we find none.
    The judgment is affirmed.
    -2-
    A true copy.
    Attest:
    CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
    -3-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 96-3949

Filed Date: 9/26/1997

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/13/2015