CIR v. Richard McGirl ( 1997 )


Menu:
  •                     United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 96-4213
    ___________
    Richard K. McGirl and                 *
    Christine M. McGirl,                  *
    *
    Appellants,             *
    * Appeal from the
    v.                               * United States Tax Court
    *
    Commissioner of Internal              *      [UNPUBLISHED]
    Revenue,                              *
    *
    Appellee.               *
    ___________
    Submitted:       October 23, 1997
    Filed:           November 28, 1997
    ___________
    Before McMILLIAN, FLOYD R. GIBSON and BEAM, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    Richard K. McGirl and Christine M. McGirl (“appellants”) appeal from
    the United States Tax Court’s1 decision upholding the Commissioner of
    Internal Revenue’s determination that appellants’ unreported income for the
    1989, 1990, and 1991 tax years should not be reduced by the amount of loans
    that appellants maintain they
    1
    The Honorable Juan Vasquez, Judge, United States Tax Court.
    obtained from a third party; that appellants failed to prove that their
    sandwich shop business incurred expenses in excess of those claimed on its
    1989, 1990, and 1991 tax returns; and that the underreporting of the
    business’s income for those years was due, in part, to fraudulent intent
    on the part of Richard K. McGirl. McGirl v. Commissioner, No. 11510-94,
    
    1996 WL 385813
    (T.C. July 11, 1996) (memorandum and order).
    Jurisdiction was proper in the tax court based upon Section 6213 of
    the Internal Revenue Code (“I.R.C.”). Jurisdiction on appeal is proper
    based upon I.R.C. § 7482(a) (1994). The notice of appeal was timely filed
    under Rule 13(a) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
    The tax court held that appellants failed to meet their burden of
    showing that they are entitled to additional deductions and that the
    Commissioner’s determination of gross income is incorrect. Slip op. at 14-
    15, 23-24.     Specifically, the tax court found it “improbable and
    unconvincing” that appellants received loans in the amounts that they
    sought to characterize as nonincome or incurred business expenses which
    were not reflected on the business’s 1989, 1990, and 1991 tax returns. 
    Id. at 20.
    Moreover, the tax court held that the Commissioner proved by clear
    and convincing evidence that at least some part of appellants’
    underpayments were attributable to fraud on the part of Richard K. McGirl.
    
    Id. at 35.
    Having carefully reviewed the record, the parties’ briefs, and the
    well-reasoned analysis of the tax court, we conclude that no error of law
    or fact appears and that an opinion would lack precedential value. See 8th
    Cir. R. 47B. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the tax court.
    A true copy.
    Attest:
    CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 96-4213

Filed Date: 11/28/1997

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/13/2015