United States v. Kenneth A. Frazier ( 1997 )


Menu:
  •                           United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 97-1022
    ___________
    United States of America,              *
    *
    Appellee,                  *
    * Appeal from the United States
    v.                                * District Court for the
    * Northern District of Iowa.
    Kenneth A. Frazier, also known as      *
    Kenneth A. Frazier, Sr.,               *     [UNPUBLISHED]
    *
    Appellant.                 *
    ___________
    Submitted: December 12, 1997
    Filed: December 24, 1997
    ___________
    Before McMILLIAN, BEAM, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    Kenneth A. Frazier appeals his 188-month sentence imposed by the district
    court,1 following his unconditional guilty plea to one count of possessing with intent to
    distribute methamphetamine. Counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v.
    California, 
    386 U.S. 738
    (1967), and was granted leave to withdraw; Frazier did not
    avail himself of the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. We affirm.
    1
    The Honorable Donald E. O&Brien, United States District Judge for the Northern
    District of Iowa.
    Frazier seeks to challenge the district court&s denial of his motion to suppress.
    By unconditionally pleading guilty, however, Frazier has waived his right to appeal the
    search and seizure issues. See United States v. McNeely, 
    20 F.3d 886
    , 888 (8th Cir.)
    (per curiam) (valid guilty plea waives all nonjurisdictional defects and defenses), cert.
    denied, 
    513 U.S. 860
    (1994). Any claim of ineffective assistance of counsel relating
    to his guilty plea is more appropriately resolved in a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 proceeding. See
    United States v. Logan, 
    49 F.3d 352
    , 361 (8th Cir. 1995).
    Having carefully reviewed the record, we find no other nonfrivolous issue for
    appeal. See Penson v. Ohio, 
    488 U.S. 75
    , 80 (1988). We remind counsel, however,
    of their obligation in filing an Anders brief. Such a brief must be done as an advocate
    for the appellant, not the government, and should refer to anything in the record that
    might arguably support the appeal. See Evans v. Clarke, 
    868 F.2d 267
    , 268 (8th Cir.
    1989).
    Accordingly, we affirm.
    A true copy.
    Attest:
    CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
    -2-