United States v. Brenda Delezene ( 1999 )


Menu:
  •                      United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 98-1562
    ___________
    United States of America,               *
    *
    Appellee,            * Appeal from the United States
    * District Court for the District
    v.                                * of Nebraska.
    *
    Brenda Delezene,                        *      [UNPUBLISHED]
    *
    Appellant.           *
    ___________
    Submitted: June 1, 1999
    Filed: June 9, 1999
    ___________
    Before HANSEN, FAGG, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    After Brenda Delezene pleaded guilty to conspiracy to transport and sell stolen
    goods, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, the district court sentenced Delezene to eight
    months imprisonment and three years supervised release. In February 1998, the district
    court revoked Delezene's supervised release based on her admissions to several
    violations of her supervised-release conditions, which included testing positive eight
    times for marijuana use. Notwithstanding the four-to-ten-month imprisonment range
    suggested under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 7B1.4(a), p.s. (1997), the court
    sentenced Delezene to eighteen months imprisonment and eighteen months supervised
    release. Delezene appeals and we affirm.
    Having carefully reviewed the record, we reject Delezene's argument that the
    district court failed to consider the applicable policy statements in Chapter 7 and the
    sentencing factors in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). We also conclude the district court did not
    abuse its discretion in imposing the eighteen-month prison term. See 18 U.S.C.
    § 3583(e)(3); United States v. Kaniss, 
    150 F.3d 967
    , 968 (8th Cir. 1998) (standard of
    review; Chapter 7 Guidelines are advisory and nonbinding; district court may depart
    from suggested revocation imprisonment range when, in its considered discretion, the
    departure is warranted).
    Accordingly, we affirm.
    A true copy.
    Attest:
    CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 98-1562

Filed Date: 6/9/1999

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021