Franki Mayer v. Kenneth S. Apfel ( 1999 )


Menu:
  •                      United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 98-4059
    ___________
    Franki Mayer,                              *
    *
    Plaintiff - Appellant,               *
    *   Appeal from the United States
    v.                                   *   District Court for the
    *   District of South Dakota.
    Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of          *
    Social Security,                           *       [UNPUBLISHED]
    *
    Defendant - Appellee.                *
    ___________
    Submitted: June 18, 1999
    Filed: July 26, 1999
    ___________
    Before LOKEN, BRIGHT, and ROSS, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    Franki Mayer applied for Social Security disability and supplemental security
    income benefits, alleging an amended disability onset date of April 1, 1995. After a
    hearing, the Commissioner’s administrative law judge decided that Mayer is not
    entitled to benefits, finding that her bipolar disorder is a severe non-exertional
    impairment, that it only slightly limits her ability to work, and that Mayer retains the
    residual functional capacity to perform her past relevant work as truck driver, sorter,
    bartender, and cashier. After the Commissioner’s Appeals Council denied Mayer’s
    request for review of the ALJ’s adverse decision, she commenced this action for
    judicial review of the Commissioner’s final decision. See 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g),
    1383(c)(3).
    The district court1 granted summary judgment in favor of the Commissioner,
    concluding that the ALJ’s decision is supported by substantial evidence in the
    administrative record as a whole. Mayer now appeals to this court, arguing the record
    does not support the ALJ’s decision because five mental health professionals have
    opined that Mayer’s psychological condition imposes substantial and therefore
    disabling restrictions on her ability to work. After careful review of the administrative
    record as a whole, we agree with the district court that the ALJ’s decision is supported
    by the requisite substantial evidence. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. Rule 47B.
    A true copy.
    Attest:
    CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
    1
    The HONORABLE RICHARD H. BATTEY, United States District Judge for
    the District of South Dakota.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 98-4059

Filed Date: 7/26/1999

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021