United States v. James Jondahl ( 1999 )

United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 98-1497
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* District of North Dakota.
James O. Jondahl, *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: August 3, 1999
Filed: August 6, 1999
___________
Before BEAM, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
James O. Jondahl appeals from the final judgment entered in the district court1
upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of four counts of filing false income tax returns
for 1990 through 1993, in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7206(1), and one count of corruptly
endeavoring to obstruct and impede the administration of revenue laws from 1985 to
1997, in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7212(a). For reversal, Jondahl argues the district
1
The Honorable Rodney S. Webb, Chief Judge, United States District Court for
the District of North Dakota.
court abused its discretion under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b) by admitting various
kinds of "bad-acts" evidence. We disagree. The evidence of Jondahl's tax liability
from years prior to the tax years in question was probative of his intent to corruptly
obstruct the IRS. See United States v. Wilson, 118 F.3d 228, 234 (4th Cir. 1997)
(elements of section 7212(a) violation). What Jondahl describes on appeal as evidence
of a "prior investment swindle" was not Rule 404(b) evidence, but rather evidence of
acts either forming the factual setting of the charged offenses, or evidence probative of
the element of willfulness. See Moore v. United States, No. 98-3578, 1999 WL
336286, at *5 (8th Cir. May 28, 1999); United States v. Heidebur, 122 F.3d 577, 579
(8th Cir. 1997).
Accordingly, we affirm.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-