United States v. Charles v. Hyde ( 1999 )

United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 99-2677
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, *
*
v. *
* Appeal from the United States
Charles V. Hyde, * District Court for the
* District of Nebraska.
Appellant, *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Phyllis R. Hyde; Mary K. Hyde; *
Michael K. Hyde, Co-Conservators *
of the Conservatorship Estate of *
Luelle R. Hyde, a Protected Person, *
*
Defendants. *
___________
Submitted: October 28, 1999
Filed: November 5, 1999
___________
Before BOWMAN, FAGG, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Charles V. Hyde appeals pro se from the district court’s1 entry of default
judgment in favor of the United States pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
55(b)(2) in this foreclosure action. After review of the record and the parties’ briefs,
we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion. See Ackra Direct Mktg.
Corp. v. Fingerhut Corp., 86 F.3d 852, 856 (8th Cir. 1996). Accordingly, we affirm.
See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
1
The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United States District Judge for the District
of Nebraska.
-2-