United States v. Richard Perales ( 2000 )


Menu:
  •                      United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 99-3854
    ___________
    United States of America,                *
    *
    Appellee,                   *
    * Appeal from the United States
    v.                                 * District Court for the
    * Western District of Missouri.
    Richard Perales,                         *
    *        [UNPUBLISHED]
    Appellant.                  *
    ___________
    Submitted: August 25, 2000
    Filed: September 7, 2000
    ___________
    Before BOWMAN, HEANEY, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    The district court1 committed Richard Perales to the Attorney General’s custody,
    pursuant to 
    18 U.S.C. § 4246
    , finding that he was suffering from a mental disease and
    that his release would pose a substantial risk of bodily injury or serious property
    damage. Perales appeals, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence.
    1
    The Honorable Russell G. Clark, United States District Judge for the Western
    District of Missouri, adopting the report and recommendation of the Honorable James
    C. England, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Missouri.
    We conclude that the district court’s findings are not clearly erroneous, see
    United States v. S.A., 
    129 F.3d 995
    , 1000 (8th Cir. 1997) (standard of review), cert.
    denied, 
    523 U.S. 1011
     (1998), as they are supported by the unanimous opinion of the
    government’s medical experts and Perales’s own medical expert, see United States v.
    Lewis, 
    929 F.2d 440
    , 442 (8th Cir. 1991) (per curiam) (§ 4246 findings of mental
    disease and dangerousness upheld where supported by unanimous expert opinion);
    United States v. Steil, 
    916 F.2d 485
    , 488 (8th Cir. 1990) (emphasizing that “there is no
    medical opinion to the contrary in the record before us” in affirming § 4246 findings
    of mental illness and dangerousness).
    Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.
    A true copy.
    Attest:
    CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 99-3854

Filed Date: 9/7/2000

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/13/2015