United States v. Richard Carl Wyatt ( 2000 )


Menu:
  •                       United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    Nos. 99-3989/99-3990/99-3991/99-3992/99-3993
    ___________
    United States of America,                *
    *
    Appellee,                   *
    * Appeals from the United States
    v.                                 * District Court for the
    * Northern District of Iowa.
    Richard Carl Wyatt,                      *
    *      [UNPUBLISHED]
    Appellant.                  *
    ___________
    Submitted: September 13, 2000
    Filed: October 5, 2000
    ___________
    Before BOWMAN and BEAM, Circuit Judges, and BOGUE,1 District Judge.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    Richard Carl Wyatt appeals his sentence pursuant to a guilty plea for crimes
    relating to bank robberies in Iowa, Nebraska, Wisconsin, and Missouri. Specifically,
    Wyatt argues two grounds for reversal: first, that he received ineffective assistance of
    1
    The Honorable Andrew W. Bogue, United States District Judge for the District
    of South Dakota, sitting by designation.
    counsel, and second, that the District Court2 erred in its application of the sentencing
    guidelines.
    Absent extraordinary circumstances, an ineffective assistance of counsel claim
    cannot be raised on direct appeal. See United States v. Santana, 
    150 F.3d 860
    , 863
    (8th Cir. 1998). Such claims are more appropriately raised in a 28 U.S.C. § 2255
    motion for post-conviction relief. See United States v. Martinez-Cruz, 
    186 F.3d 1102
    ,
    1105 (8th Cir. 1999). We do not find extraordinary circumstances in this case, and
    therefore decline to address the claim in this proceeding.
    Further, we find no clear error in the District Court's application of U.S.S.G.
    § 3C1.1 (obstruction) and § 3E1.1 (acceptance of responsibility). Neither do we find
    that the District Court abused its discretion in granting the government's motion for an
    upward departure pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 4A1.3 (adequacy of criminal history
    category). See United States v. Collins, 
    104 F.3d 143
    , 144 (8th Cir. 1997)
    (summarizing standards of review).
    Accordingly, we affirm.
    A true copy.
    Attest:
    CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
    2
    The Honorable Mark W. Bennett, Unites States District Judge for the Northern
    District of Iowa.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 99-3989

Filed Date: 10/5/2000

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/13/2015