Rolf Rosendahl v. Charles Norman ( 2000 )


Menu:
  •                      United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 00-1272
    ___________
    Rolf A. Rosendahl,                         *
    *
    Appellant,                   *
    *
    v.                                  * Appeal from the United States
    * District Court for the
    Charles M. Norman, Jr., Sheriff, in his * Western District of Missouri.
    official capacity as Sheriff of Johnson    *
    County, Missouri; Mary Ann Young,          *      [UNPUBLISHED]
    Prosecuting Attorney, Prosecuting          *
    Attorney for Johnson County, Missouri, *
    in her individual capacity as a state      *
    actor; Joseph P. Dandurand, Judge,         *
    Circuit Judge for Johnson County,          *
    Missouri, in his individual capacity as a *
    state actor in this case; Mel Carnahan, *
    Governor of the State of Missouri,         *
    acting in his individual and official      *
    capacities as such,                        *
    *
    Appellees.                   *
    ___________
    Submitted: December 22, 2000
    Filed: December 27, 2000
    ___________
    Before BEAM, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    In 1999, Rolf Rosendahl brought this 
    42 U.S.C. § 1983
     action seeking
    declaratory and injunctive relief in connection with his arrest and the forfeiture of his
    property. The district court1 dismissed Rosendahl’s complaint prior to service of
    process, and he appeals. Having carefully reviewed the record and Rosendahl’s
    arguments on appeal, we agree with the district court that most of the claims involve
    conduct that occurred between 1991 and 1993. To the extent they are not barred under
    Heck v. Humphrey, 
    512 U.S. 477
     (1994), these claims are time-barred. See Simmons
    v. O’Brien, 
    77 F.3d 1093
    , 1094-97 (8th Cir. 1996); Chandler v. Presiding Judge,
    Calloway County, 
    838 F.2d 977
    , 978-79 (8th Cir. 1988). The remainder of
    Rosendahl’s complaint challenges judicial rulings in a state forfeiture action, with
    which we will not interfere. See Charchenko v. City of Stillwater, 
    47 F.3d 981
    , 983
    (8th Cir. 1995).
    Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
    A true copy.
    Attest:
    CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
    1
    The HONORABLE HOWARD F. SACHS, United States District Judge for the
    Western District of Missouri.
    -2-