Anthony Keith Lanos v. URS Logistics ( 2000 )

United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 99-3727
___________
Anthony Keith Lanos, and others in *
class action suit that are still awaiting
*
the right to sue from the EEOC, *
*
Appellant, * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the Eastern
v. * District of Arkansas.
*
URS Logistics, doing business as * [UNPUBLISHED]
Americold Logistics, Inc., *
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: November 28, 2000
Filed: December 4, 2000
___________
Before BEAM, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Anthony Keith Lanos appeals the district court's order dismissing under Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure 37(b)(2)(C) Lanos's employment discrimination action against
his former employer, URS Logistics (URS). Lanos failed to provide URS with
requested discovery, despite three court orders to do so. Having carefully reviewed the
record, we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing Lanos's
action. See Boogaerts v. Bank of Bradley, 961 F.2d 765, 768 (8th Cir. 1992) (per
curiam) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-