Dianne K. Mooney v. Kenneth Apfel , 6 F. App'x 546 ( 2001 )


Menu:
  •                     United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 00-2538
    ___________
    Dianne K. Mooney,                        *
    *
    Appellant,            *
    *
    v.                                 * Appeal from the United States
    * District Court for the District
    Larry Massanari, Acting                  * of Nebraska.
    Commissioner, Social Security            *
    Administration,                          *      [UNPUBLISHED]
    *
    Appellee.             *
    ___________
    Submitted: May 18, 2001
    Filed: May 24, 2001
    ___________
    Before LOKEN, ROSS, and FAGG, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    Dianne K. Mooney sought disability insurance benefits under Title II of the
    Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 401-433, claiming neurofibromatosis disabled her.
    An administrative law judge (ALJ) denied benefits, holding Mooney's 1987
    employment constituted substantial gainful activity precluding her from meeting the
    disability requirements rather than an unsuccessful work attempt as Mooney alleged.
    Mooney sought judicial review, and the district court* concluded substantial evidence
    supported the ALJ's decision. On appeal, Mooney argues her 1987 employment was
    an unsuccessful work attempt rather than substantial gainful activity and the district
    court committed error in disallowing evidence of her disability. Having carefully
    reviewed the record, we agree with the district court's analysis. The district court
    observed that Mooney worked continually from January 1987 to October 1987 at a
    nursing home, and until November 1987 as a flag person for a highway construction
    contractor. Although Mooney had difficulty performing her work because of her
    medical condition, work lasting more than six months cannot be considered an
    unsuccessful work attempt. See King v. Chater, 
    72 F.3d 85
    , 87 (8th Cir. 1995);
    Nettles v. Sullivan, 
    956 F.2d 820
    , 822-23 (8th Cir. 1992). Because substantial
    evidence supported the ALJ's decision, we affirm on the basis of the district court's
    memorandum and order.
    A true copy.
    Attest:
    CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
    *
    The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, Chief Judge, United States District Court for
    the District of Nebraska.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 00-2538

Citation Numbers: 6 F. App'x 546

Judges: Loken, Ross, Fagg

Filed Date: 5/24/2001

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024