United States v. Kirk Turner ( 2000 )


Menu:
  •                       United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 99-3519
    ___________
    United States of America,                  *
    *
    Appellee,             * Appeal from the United States
    * District Court for the Eastern
    v.                                   * District of Arkansas.
    *
    Kirk Brian Turner,                         *      [UNPUBLISHED]
    *
    Appellant.            *
    ___________
    Submitted: April 11, 2000
    Filed: April 19, 2000
    ___________
    Before McMILLIAN and FAGG, Circuit Judges, and ROSENBAUM,* District Judge.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    Kirk Brian Turner pleaded guilty to distributing cocaine base in violation of 21
    U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). The district court sentenced Turner as a career offender under
    U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual (U.S.S.G.) § 4B1.1, which applies when the
    defendant has "at least two prior felony convictions of . . . a crime of violence," 
    id. § 4B1.1(3),
    because the court concluded Turner's California conviction for shooting at
    *
    The Honorable James M. Rosenbaum, United States District Judge for the
    District of Minnesota, sitting by designation.
    an inhabited dwelling was a crime of violence within the meaning of § 4B1.1. Turner
    appeals his sentence, challenging this conclusion.
    Section 4B1.2(a) of the Sentencing Guidelines defines a "crime of violence" for
    the purposes of § 4B1.1 as "any offense under federal or state law . . . that has as an
    element the use, attempted use or threatened use of physical force against the person
    of another, or . . . otherwise involves conduct that presents a serious risk of physical
    injury to another." 
    Id. § 4B1.2(a).
    Turner contends his California offense was just a
    crime against property rather than a crime of violence as defined in U.S.S.G. §
    4B1.2(a). We disagree.
    In 1994, Turner was convicted of violating § 246 of the California Penal Code,
    which provided: "Any person who shall maliciously and willfully discharge a firearm
    at an inhabited dwelling . . . is guilty of felony . . . . As used in this section, 'inhabited'
    means currently being used for dwelling purposes, whether occupied or not." The
    conviction resulted from Turner's discharge of a gun in a house occupied by Turner's
    girlfriend following an angry confrontation with her. We agree with the district court
    that Turner's conviction was for a crime of violence within the meaning of § 4B1.1.
    See United States v. Weinert, 
    1 F.3d 889
    , 891 (9th Cir. 1993) (per curiam) (shooting
    at an inhabited dwelling in violation of Cal. Penal Code § 246 is a crime of violence
    within the meaning of U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1). We thus affirm Turner's sentence.
    A true copy.
    Attest:
    CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 99-3519

Filed Date: 4/19/2000

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021