United States v. Cloyd Cotton ( 2000 )


Menu:
  •                      United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 99-2439
    ___________
    United States of America,                 *
    *
    Appellee,                    *
    * Appeal from the United States
    v.                                  * District Court for the
    * Eastern District of Arkansas.
    Cloyd Cotton,                             * [UNPUBLISHED]
    *
    Appellant.                   *
    ___________
    Submitted: March 30, 2000
    Filed: April 5, 2000
    ___________
    Before LOKEN, FAGG, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    Cloyd Cotton appeals the district court’s1 denial of his motion for a judgment of
    acquittal on a charge of distributing cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1)
    (1999). After a careful review of the record and the parties’ submissions, we conclude
    that the evidence, viewed most favorably to the verdict, would permit a reasonable-
    minded jury to find Cotton guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. See United States v.
    James, 
    172 F.3d 588
    , 591 (8th Cir. 1999) (standard of review). The evidence showed
    1
    The Honorable George Howard, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern
    District of Arkansas.
    that officers watched from a distance as an informant equipped with an audio recorder
    drove toward Cotton’s residence; the informant returned with cocaine base and
    identified Cotton as the seller; and both the informant and one of the officers, who had
    known Cotton for several years, identified Cotton’s voice on the recording. See United
    States v. Gordon, 
    974 F.2d 97
    , 98-100 (8th Cir. 1992) (where FBI agent maintained
    surveillance outside building while drug informant made purchase inside, and informant
    then turned drugs over to agent, informant’s testimony--which was corroborated by
    agent’s--was sufficient to support conviction). We reject Cotton’s attack on the
    informant’s credibility. Cf. 
    id. at 100
    (where informant’s criminal history and
    arrangements with government to avoid prosecution were brought out on cross-
    examination, jury’s credibility assessment was not disturbed). Accordingly, we affirm
    the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
    A true copy.
    Attest:
    CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 99-2439

Filed Date: 4/5/2000

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021