Bilbrey v. United States Department of the Air Force , 20 F. App'x 597 ( 2001 )


Menu:
  •                     United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 01-1789
    ___________
    Christopher L. Bilbrey,                *
    *
    Appellant,                *
    * Appeal from the United States
    v.                              * District Court for the
    * Western District of Missouri.
    United States Department of the Air    *
    Force; F. Whitten Peters, Individually *       [UNPUBLISHED]
    and as Secretary, Department of the    *
    Air Force, Pentagon, Washington, D.C.; *
    David R. Stinson, Deputy Director,     *
    Communications and Information         *
    Systems Headquarters Air Combat        *
    Command; Don W. Fox, Deputy            *
    General Counsel (Fiscal, Ethics and    *
    Civilian Personnel),                   *
    *
    Appellees.                *
    ___________
    Submitted: October 12, 2001
    Filed: October 16. 2001
    ___________
    Before WOLLMAN, Chief Judge, BOWMAN, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    Christopher L. Bilbrey filed this action seeking unredacted copies of
    documents he received from the United States Air Force (USAF) as a result of his
    request under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 
    5 U.S.C. § 552
    . The district
    court1 granted summary judgment to the USAF in part and to Bilbrey in part,
    concluding that redactions in one document were proper, but ordering the USAF to
    provide Bilbrey with nearly all of the redacted portions of a second document.
    Bilbrey appeals.
    After careful de novo review of the record, including unredacted copies of the
    documents at issue, we conclude that the redacted material is both predecisional and
    deliberative, and therefore, exempt from disclosure under FOIA exemption 5. See
    Missouri v. United States Army Corp of Eng’rs, 
    147 F.3d 708
    , 710 (8th Cir. 1998)
    (exemption 5 permits nondisclosure of inter- or intra-agency memorandum which is
    both predecisional and deliberative).
    Accordingly, we affirm.
    A true copy.
    Attest:
    CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
    1
    The HONORABLE GARY A. FENNER, United States District Judge for the
    Western District of Missouri.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 01-1789

Citation Numbers: 20 F. App'x 597

Judges: Wollman, Bowman, Loken

Filed Date: 10/16/2001

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024