Leonard C. Lee v. Tommy G. Thompson , 119 F. App'x 848 ( 2005 )


Menu:
  •                     United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 04-1165
    ___________
    Leonard C. Lee,                           *
    *
    Appellant,                  *
    * Appeal from the United States
    v.                                 * District Court for the Eastern
    * District of Arkansas.
    Tommy G. Thompson, Secretary,             *
    United States Department of Health        * [UNPUBLISHED]
    and Human Services,                       *
    *
    Appellee,                   *
    *
    Vicky Ross-Barsch, Individually and       *
    in her official capacity as Assistant     *
    Deputy Director, NCTR; Victor G.          *
    Attwood, Individually and in his          *
    official capacity as Deputy Director,     *
    NCTR; Mary Ann Hutchinson,                *
    Individually and in her official capacity *
    as Personnel Director, NCTR; Dick         *
    King, Individually and in his official    *
    capacity as Personnel Specialist,         *
    NCTR; Kimberly Carter, Individually *
    and in her official capacity as Director *
    Division of Personnel Operations,         *
    ORA; George Calvert, Individually         *
    and in his official capacity as Director, *
    Classification Services, FDA,             *
    *
    Defendants.                 *
    ___________
    Submitted: December 24, 2004
    Filed: January 24, 2005
    ___________
    Before BYE, MELLOY, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    Leonard Lee appeals the district court’s1 adverse judgment after a bench trial
    in his Title VII action against the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human
    Services. After carefully reviewing the record, we find no clear error in the district
    court’s findings that Lee did not prove race discrimination, retaliation, or harassment.
    See Tadlock v. Powell, 
    291 F.3d 541
    , 546 (8th Cir. 2002) (standard of review). We
    also agree with the court that Lee did not exhaust his administrative remedies on his
    claim that supervisors discriminated and retaliated against him by accusing him of
    fraud in a worker’s compensation case. See Burkett v. Glickman, 
    327 F.3d 658
    , 660
    (8th Cir. 2003).
    Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
    ______________________________
    1
    The Honorable James M. Moody, United States District Judge for the Eastern
    District of Arkansas.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-1165

Citation Numbers: 119 F. App'x 848

Judges: Bye, Melloy, Colloton

Filed Date: 1/24/2005

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024