United States v. Maria Andrade-Mora , 118 F. App'x 110 ( 2005 )


Menu:
  •                      United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 04-1700
    ___________
    United States of America,          *
    *
    Appellant,              *
    * Appeal from the United States
    v.                           * District Court for the
    * Southern District of Iowa.
    Maria Delourdes Andrade-Mora,      *
    * [UNPUBLISHED]
    Appellee.               *
    ___________
    Submitted: December 30, 2004
    Filed: January 18, 2005
    ___________
    Before MURPHY, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    Maria Delourdes Andrade-Mora was found guilty after a jury trial of conspiring
    to distribute, and possessing with intent to distribute, methamphetamine, in violation
    of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(A), and 846. The government appeals the
    sentence, which reflected a downward departure under U.S.S.G. § 5K2.12 (coercion
    and duress). Andrade-Mora argues that the government did not preserve its objection
    to the departure. We reverse and remand.
    Having carefully reviewed the record, we find that the government preserved
    its objection to a sentence below the mandatory minimum. Reviewing de novo the
    district court’s decision to depart, see United States v. McCart, 
    377 F.3d 874
    , 876-77
    (8th Cir. 2004) (standard of review), we find that the court exceeded its authority,
    because the government did not file a substantial-assistance motion, see 18 U.S.C.
    § 3553(e), and the court did not find that Andrade-Mora qualified for safety-valve
    relief, see 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f). Cf. United States v. Chacon, 
    330 F.3d 1065
    , 1066
    (8th Cir. 2003) (“district court was correct that it could not use § 5K2.0 to depart
    below the statutory minimum because ‘the only authority for the district court to
    depart below the statutorily mandated minimum sentence is found in 18 U.S.C.
    §§ 3553(e) and (f), which apply only when the government makes a motion for
    substantial assistance or when the defendant qualifies under the safety valve
    provision’” (quoted case omitted)). Accordingly, we vacate Andrade-Mora’s
    sentence and remand for resentencing consistent with this opinion.
    ______________________________
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-1700

Citation Numbers: 118 F. App'x 110

Judges: Murphy, Fagg, Smith

Filed Date: 1/18/2005

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024