United States v. Randy Boose ( 2005 )


Menu:
  •                      United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 04-2547
    ___________
    United States of America,               *
    *
    Appellee,                  *
    * Appeal from the United
    v.                                * States District Court for the
    * Northern District of Iowa.
    Randy Steven Boose,                     *
    *
    Appellant.                 *
    ___________
    Submitted: December 14, 2004
    Filed: April 13, 2005
    ___________
    Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, BEAM, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    Randy Boose pleaded guilty to one count of conspiring to distribute 500 grams
    or more of methamphetamine, having previously been convicted of one or more
    felony drug offenses, see 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(A), 846, 851. The district
    court1 then sentenced him to 270 months in prison. He argues that the district court
    failed to give him his right to allocution before sentencing him.
    1
    The Honorable Linda R. Reade, United States District Judge for the Northern
    District of Iowa.
    Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32(i)(4)(A)(ii) states that "[b]efore
    imposing sentence, the court must ... address the defendant personally in order to
    permit the defendant to speak or present any information to mitigate the sentence."
    Mr. Boose relies on United States v. Patterson, 
    128 F.3d 1259
    , 1261 (8th Cir. 1997),
    for the principle that denying a defendant the right to allocution warrants reversal.
    But the difficulty with Mr. Boose's argument is that he was not denied his right to
    allocution. Although the court indicated its intention to impose a 270-month
    sentence, no sentence was imposed until after giving Mr. Boose the opportunity to
    speak:
    THE COURT: All right. Mr. Boose, I'll be happy to hear from you as
    to what you feel you'd like to say. You're not required to speak, but I'm
    certainly willing to listen.
    THE DEFENDANT: No, ma'am.
    The court did not state that Mr. Boose's comments would have no effect, but
    assured him that it would listen to what he had to say. Mr. Boose declined the offer.
    The district judge then imposed Mr. Boose's sentence, stating that "it is the judgment
    of this court that Randy Boose is hereby committed to the custody of the Bureau of
    Prisons ... for 270 months." Cf. United States v. Williams, 
    109 F.3d 502
    , 513 (8th Cir.
    1997), cert. denied, 
    522 U.S. 917
    (1997). For the reasons stated, we affirm the
    district court's judgment.
    ______________________________
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-2547

Filed Date: 4/13/2005

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/13/2015