United States v. Christopher A Welker ( 2005 )


Menu:
  •                      United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 04-3535
    ___________
    United States of America,                 *
    *
    Appellee,                    * Appeal from the United States
    * District Court for the Eastern
    v.                                  * District of Missouri.
    *
    * [UNPUBLISHED]
    Christopher A. Welker,                    *
    *
    Appellant.                   *
    ___________
    Submitted: April 11, 2005
    Filed: May 16, 2005
    ___________
    Before COLLOTON, McMILLIAN, BENTON, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    After admitting to stealing seven firearms, Christopher Andrew Welker pleaded
    guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm, a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1).
    The district court1 enhanced Welker's sentence based on the Armed Career Criminal
    Act of 1984 (ACCA) of 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1). He appeals the enhancement, arguing
    that the district court violated Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. ---, 
    124 S. Ct. 2531
    1
    The Honorable Rodney W. Sippel, United States District Judge for the Eastern
    District of Missouri.
    (2004) by "finding" that his three prior burglary convictions were violent felonies.
    This court reviews de novo whether a prior offense is a violent felony under section
    924(e). United States v. Abernathy, 
    277 F.3d 1048
    , 1051 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 
    535 U.S. 1089
    (2002). Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms.
    The ACCA mandates a minimum15-year sentence for a violation of section
    922(g)(1) when the person has three or more convictions for a "violent felony." 18
    U.S.C. § 924(e)(1). A prior conviction is a sentencing factor for the court.
    Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 
    523 U.S. 224
    , 243-44 (1998). Whether a prior
    conviction is a violent felony is a question of law for the court, not an issue submitted
    to a jury. United States v. Sanders, 
    377 F.3d 845
    , 847 n.3 (8th Cir. 2004). Therefore,
    a court does not engage in prohibited fact-finding when enhancing sentences under
    the ACCA for prior convictions. See United States v. Painter, 
    400 F.3d 1111
    , 1111
    (8th Cir. 2005).
    This court has held repeatedly that a burglary conviction is a violent felony.
    United States v. Nolan, 
    397 F.3d 665
    , 666 (8th Cir. 2005); United States v.
    Blahowski, 
    324 F.3d 592
    , 594-95 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 
    540 U.S. 934
    (2003); United
    States v. Hascall, 
    76 F.3d 902
    , 904 (8th Cir. 1996). Moreover, section 924(e)
    includes burglary in the definition of violent felony. 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(B)(ii).
    Because Welker had three burglary convictions, the district court did not err in
    enhancing his sentence under the ACCA.
    The judgment of the district court is affirmed.
    _____________________________
    -2-