Jahhar v. AT & T Communications, Inc. , 82 F. App'x 502 ( 2003 )

United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 03-2656
___________
Rahjah Jahhar, *
*
Appellant, * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the
v. * District of Minnesota.
*
AT&T Communications, Inc., * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: December 3, 2003
Filed: December 9, 2003
___________
Before BYE, BOWMAN, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Rahjah Jahhar appeals the district court’s1 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
12(b)(6) dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. After careful review of the record,
see Gordon v. Hansen, 168 F.3d 1109, 1113 (8th Cir. 1999) (per curiam) (de novo
standard of review), we agree that Jahhar failed to state a claim because he did not
allege any state action, see Youngblood v. Hy-Vee Food Stores, Inc., 266 F.3d 851,
1
The Honorable Michael J. Davis, United States District Judge for the District
of Minnesota.
855 (8th Cir. 2001) (“Only state actors can be held liable under Section 1983."), cert.
denied, 535 U.S. 1017 (2002). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-